MFSK 2000

HF propagation and the Ionosphere

Design of digital modes for HF must take into account the effect the Ionosphere has, both in terms of propagation, and the way it distorts the signals.

Introduction

The ionosphere is a force to be reckoned with by all comms engineers and Radio Amateurs. It of course affects HF most of all, but the effects are noticed from LF to VHF. At VHF and beyond other effects occur, such as tropospheric ducting, meteor and aircraft scatter, canyon effects, picket fencing, and a host of other effects. VHF and UHF are also the domain of satellite and moon bounce communications, with rotation fading, libration and motion doppler effects.

This is not intended to be a treatise on the ionosphere, but some of the effects which have a significant impact on digital mode design will be discussed. First, the various frequency ranges and their characteristics will be described, followed by a discussion of each of the more significant effects and how they can be overcome - especially by MFSK 2000 of course!

LF Propagation

On LF,Low Frequency, 30 - 300 kHz reception of signals is characterised by slow diurnalDaily and seasonal variations of signal strength, and very stable phase.Because the signal path
length does not change The signals follow the line of the earth, so are not to any great extent affected by ionospheric reflections. At times, late at night for example, fading (interaction of ground wave and sky wave) can occur.

LF is plagued by man-made noise, especially TV, motor and power noise.

MF and Low HF

MFMedium Frequency, 300 - 3000 kHz and HFHigh Frequency, 3 MHz - 30 MHz up to about 5 MHz have short (ground wave) range during the day, as a result of sky wave absorption in the D layer. This area of low ionisation levels but high ion density is quickly activated at sunrise, and blankets the arriving sky wave (from the E and F layers). At night, the D layer fades quickly, allowing the sky waves to penetrate, giving a range of several thousand km, and sometimes more, as the signal is now able to bounce off the higher ionised layers. At night signal strengths are very high, but so too is the strength of the lightning noise, which travels long distances. These frequencies are a real challenge for digital transmission and reception.

This area is affected by man-made noise, especially during the day, and by lightning burst noise at night. Because the sky wave propagation modes can be numerous, interaction between them, and with the ground wave, leads to very strong fading and significant variations in signal arrival time.Because the different reflective paths
all travel different distances Reception is also seriously affected by interference from other radio signals.

HF DX Bands

The area from 5 to 30 MHz is generally considered to be the area where long distance communications"DX" is best. This area is strongly affected by ionospheric reflection, so multiple "bounces" and both short and long paths can be effective. Short path signals generally follow the obvious "great circle" route between stations. Long path generally takes place in the evening, travelling on a reciprocal path, through the night-time ionosphere which is generally more stable.

HF is strongly affected by the activity of the sun, ionising the many reflective layers on a daily basis. This ionisation varies with short term solar activity, and the 11 year solar cycle. When the sun is especially active (during a solar storm) HF propagation can disappear for days. During a solar activity minimum, ionospheric propagation is generally limited to single hop range unless unusual propagation paths occur.

The ionization of the reflecting layers varies with altitude, time of day and latitude. A strong concentration of ions at the poles and the variation in concentration during the day leads to relatively fast changes in refractive index, modulating the phase, frequency and amplitude of signals in both random (noise) and predictable ways (diurnal rising or lowering reflective height).

Lightning noise is a problem at the lower end of the HF range. Very weak signals are a bigger problem at the upper end, and all the HF area is affected by fading and doppler effects. Reception of the more popular HF frequencies is also seriously affected by interference from other radio signals.

VHF and UHF

Apart from rare occurences of sporadic E and effects such as Trans-equatorial ducting, ionospheric effects are few on VHF,Very High Frequency
30 - 300 MHz and non-existent on UHF.Ultra High Frequency,
300 - 3000 MHz Ducting through tropospheric temperature inversion, An area of the atmosphere  at an
altitude of about 2 - 10,000m is common, but unlike ionospheric reflection, this is a "lens" effect, like a light pipe, rather than a reflective effect. VHF and UHF signals are characterised by stable phase when ground wave communications are used.

Satellite communications suffers from gross (movement induced) doppler frequency shifts. Moon-bounce suffers from "libration fading" which affects the phase and amplitude of signals arriving from the moon. Fading and polarisation rotation effects are noticed on satellite and terrestrial signals. Reflection from other objects causes random and often very deep fades. When the transmitter or receiver is in motion, or a large moving object (like an aircraft) creates a reflective path, this fading is rhythmical at a rate dependent on the speed and the signal wavelength (sometimes called the picket fence effect").

Designing a Digital Mode

Having discussed the properties of the various frequencies on which Amateurs wish to communicate we need to consider the problems that face attempts to communicate, which are of course part of the design strategy for digital modes. Some are the properties of the ionospheric medium just discussed, while others are man-made or limitations of the technology:
  1. Man-made noise, such as TV buzz, power noise (continuous noise)
  2. Lightning noise, man-made clicks and splats (pulse or burst noise)
  3. Fading and very weak signals
  4. Signal arrival time (multi-path reception)
  5. Selective fading
  6. Ionospheric doppler modulation effects
  7. Interference from other signals, carrier interference
  8. Frequency drift, satellite doppler shift

    To design a digital mode to address all these problems is a tall order!

Since it is not possible to create a data mode to do everything under all conditions, these things tend to be designed for specific applications, under the most likely conditions. Here are some of the applications used by Amateurs:

It is this last "Rag-Chew" category that we will concentrate on.

HF "Rag-Chew" Mode Typical Specifications
  • Communications half duplex (one person at a time transmits), manually operated
  • Data transmitted at typing speed (25 WPM), perhaps 50 WPM to allow for small files to be transferred
  • Full ASCII character set, including European accented characters
  • Modest to good error performance on noisy signals
  • Fast turn-around from receive to transmit and vice-versa
  • Easy tuning and tolerance of drift and mis-tuning
  • Should operate with an SSB transceiver
  • Should operate with a Pentium PC with 16 bit sound card
  • Should be relatively immune to all the reception problems listed above!

Problems to Surmount

1. Continuous Noise
The best counter to continuous noise is to limit the bandwidth of the signal. Another method is to employ a technique which is noise immune, such as FSK and especially PSK. Use of error recovery systems is very helpful in reducing the effects of noise. Methods such as FAX, SSTV and Hellschreiber are relatively noise tolerant because the eye is able to easily recognise patterns and ignore noise.

2. Burst Noise
Unlike continuous noise, which affects the signal all the time, burst noise is characterised by occasional bursts of energy so large that they swamp the receiver and cause data to be missed. AsynchronousEach character is timed independently,
with start and stop signalling bits systems are seriously affected by such noise since it causes loss of synchronism. The simplest systems (such as RTTY) simply pass on the errors caused by burst noise to the user, and accept the occasional serious loss of synchronism. Burst noise can be managed very well using error recovery systems, especially if an interleaver is used to spread the lost data bits across several characters, thus reducing the instantaneous error correction load.

3. Fading and Weak Signals
A system with good AGCAutomatic
Gain Control or dynamic range will be affective agains fading (slow changes in signal strength, or faster changes due to multi-path cancelling). Systems such as PSK that are independent of signal amplitude are also very effective.

4. Multi-path Reception
While multi-path reception can cause signal cancellation and therefore fading, the bigger problem is that the various components of the signal can arrive at significantly different times, because of the different path lengths. It is not unusual for two different paths to differ in time by 5 - 10ms, which may be a significant proportion of the symbol period. As each component fades or strengthens, the data can be distorted and the timing changed to interfere with correct recognition of the data bits. At 50 baud, 5ms represents 25% distortion.

One of the best counters to multi-path problems is to use a very low symbol rate. MFSK is ideal in this regard. For example, at 10 baud, typical of MFSK systems, 5ms timing error represents only 5% distortion. PSK systems with asynchronous detection (PSK-Hell is the only known example) perform reasonably well, but conventional synchronous demodulation PSK modes such as PSK31 do not cope well with bad multi-path, which is very common on the lower HF bands at night. The following diagram illustrates multi-path and other effects. The ionosphere is not a perfect mirror, and in addition to the different path lengths and therefore time of flight, there is considerable delay at the reflective layer as the refractive index and therefore speed of the radio waves changes.


An illustration of multi-path, selective fading and doppler effects

5. Selective Fading
Fading is a particularly insidious problem as it has several difficult components - weak signals and therefore noise; selective fading which causes distortion of pulse shapes and some frequencies to be weaker than others; and large timing variations. As seen in the diagram above, many signals with completely different timing and therefore phase can arrive at the receiver, and cause cancellation or enhancement of each other. The cancellation can be very sharp, eliminating or weakening a narrow range of frequencies within the signal. This next spectrogram image is a classic example of this effect. The signal is exactly 1 kHz wide (an MT63 transmission from VK2DSG on 14 MHz), and the diagonal white lines through the image are the effect of multiple-path induced selective cancellation within the signal. The horizontal time scale is about 10 seconds.

MT63 signal with selective fading
An MT63 signal with selective fading

The best counter to this problem is to employ a very sensitive narrow band system with very slow symbol rate. PSK31 is a modern example of such a mode. Hellschreiber (Feld-Hell and PSK-Hell) is also very effective. MFSK is also very good in this regard, provided the detection of each carrier is independent of the others, or the system can cope with missing symbols (such as by using an error reduction system).

6. Ionospheric Doppler Modulation
The ionosphere is always moving. This is illustrated in the diagram further up this page. As the earth rotates, the polarised layers change in height over hundreds of kilometres, and their ion densities and refractive index also change. Thus the effective height of the reflecting layer can move at speeds up to hundreds of km/hr, quite sufficient speed to alter the frequency slightly, although at least reasonably predictably.

The ionosphere, particularly in the regions near the poles, can be especially disturbed by solar activity, and this random variation of refractive properties, like waves in the ocean, unfortunately causes significant random modulation of the phase, frequency and amplitude of signals. The effect is of course most noticeable on paths across the poles, such as the long-path from New Zealand and Australia to Europe. This is especially a problem with PSK modes, but does effect all modes to some extent.

7. Interfering Signals
Much interference (Morse or SSB) is of a burst nature, and can be countered by systems designed to handle burst noise. Carrier interference and repetitive continuous interference is difficult to counter, and best achieved by using wide band highly redundant systems such as spread spectrum or frequency division multiplex. Error reduction coding can be very effective on this type of interference if the signal is spread so that only part of it is interfered with. MT63 is an example of this type of strategy, spread in time to limit the effect of burst noise, and spread in frequency to limit carrier interference.

8. Drift and Doppler Shift
This problem essentially means that the received signal is not optimally tuned. Of course narrow systems are more effected. PSK does not tolerate even the smallest amount of drift, while FSK is more tolerant. MFSK is not very tolerant, since the signal quickly drifts outside the narrow channel filters. AM and wideband modes are best. Feld-Hell, which is an AM modulation system, copes very well with satellite links, combining its good noise immunity with extreme tolerance of mistuning.


MFSK 2000 Home Page